http://www.qualityinspection.org/check-small-orders-produced-together/ Advice and tips for successful quality control of consumer products made in China & Asia: sourcing strategies, quality control... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:05:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.qualityinspection.org/check-small-orders-produced-together/comment-page-1/#comment-5116 Sampling plan calculations for quality inspections [infographic] Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:02:58 +0000 http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=1011#comment-5116 [...] Most inspections only involve 1 or 2 references, and can be conducted in one man-day (i.e. one inspector on site for one day). However, in certain situations, deciding on a sample plan is very difficult–see my previous article about shipments including many references. [...] [...] Most inspections only involve 1 or 2 references, and can be conducted in one man-day (i.e. one inspector on site for one day). However, in certain situations, deciding on a sample plan is very difficult–see my previous article about shipments including many references. [...]

]]> http://www.qualityinspection.org/check-small-orders-produced-together/comment-page-1/#comment-393 Renaud Anjoran Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:39:37 +0000 http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=1011#comment-393 Hi Orientix, I agree with you. It all depends on the type of products and whether they are all made in the same circumstances. I am a big proponent of random inspections (to select only a few references), but as early as possible in the production cycle. If there are problems, then go for a broader checking... and if possible charge the supplier for these re-inspections! Hi Orientix,
I agree with you. It all depends on the type of products and whether they are all made in the same circumstances.
I am a big proponent of random inspections (to select only a few references), but as early as possible in the production cycle. If there are problems, then go for a broader checking… and if possible charge the supplier for these re-inspections!

]]> http://www.qualityinspection.org/check-small-orders-produced-together/comment-page-1/#comment-392 orientix Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:27:45 +0000 http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=1011#comment-392 I frequently have same problem. Too many references in smaller quantities. If I follow the AQL system, it costs too much time / days, and delays in shipment. I'm studying actually how to solve this issue. A) Reduced number of pcs to check, but all references B) Indeed only check few references in depth (Not a good idea if styles have different prints / embroideries / accessories). In my opinion you must check all references at all time. But if styles are all more or less similar, but only prints / designs differ, then no need to measure / workmanship-check each style separately. That can be grouped. (If all made in same factory). But all references always must be checked on print/design/embroidery separately. I frequently have same problem. Too many references in smaller quantities. If I follow the AQL system, it costs too much time / days, and delays in shipment. I’m studying actually how to solve this issue.
A) Reduced number of pcs to check, but all references
B) Indeed only check few references in depth (Not a good idea if styles have different prints / embroideries / accessories).
In my opinion you must check all references at all time. But if styles are all more or less similar, but only prints / designs differ, then no need to measure / workmanship-check each style separately. That can be grouped. (If all made in same factory). But all references always must be checked on print/design/embroidery separately.

]]>