<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inspecting quality earlier is better: the 1-10-100 rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/</link>
	<description>Advice and tips for successful quality control of consumer products made in China &#38; Asia: sourcing strategies, quality control...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liability insurance for importers</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Liability insurance for importers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>[...] As usual, I would argue that the most important is to catch issues upstream, at the design stage or at least at the production stage. When the products are on the market, everything is more expensive. See the 1:10:100 rule. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As usual, I would argue that the most important is to catch issues upstream, at the design stage or at least at the production stage. When the products are on the market, everything is more expensive. See the 1:10:100 rule. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warum frühzeitige Tests in der Softwareentwicklung so wichtig sind &#171; Produktmanagement und Vermarktung von Internet-Anwendungen</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Warum frühzeitige Tests in der Softwareentwicklung so wichtig sind &#171; Produktmanagement und Vermarktung von Internet-Anwendungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>[...] Das Testen neuer Entwicklungsstände gehört zu den Routinearbeiten in der Softwareentwicklung. Dessen Bedeutung sollte aber auf keinen Fall und zu keinem Zeitpunkt unterschätzt werden. Nach der 1:10:100-Regel vervielfachen sich die Kosten einer Fehlerbehebung mit dem Zeitpunkt der Entdeckung um den Faktor 10 (Erklärungen der 1:10:100 Regel in englisch: 1, 2, 3). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Das Testen neuer Entwicklungsstände gehört zu den Routinearbeiten in der Softwareentwicklung. Dessen Bedeutung sollte aber auf keinen Fall und zu keinem Zeitpunkt unterschätzt werden. Nach der 1:10:100-Regel vervielfachen sich die Kosten einer Fehlerbehebung mit dem Zeitpunkt der Entdeckung um den Faktor 10 (Erklärungen der 1:10:100 Regel in englisch: 1, 2, 3). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re-inspections: the key is to manage corrective actions</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Re-inspections: the key is to manage corrective actions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-384</guid>
		<description>[...] Sending an inspector during production is usually enough to catch issues early. In this case, the buyer has time to ask for corrective issues, and avoids last-minute surprises. In-process inspections are a powerful tool that can avoid both quality problems and shipment delays. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sending an inspector during production is usually enough to catch issues early. In this case, the buyer has time to ask for corrective issues, and avoids last-minute surprises. In-process inspections are a powerful tool that can avoid both quality problems and shipment delays. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preventing parallel supply chains</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Preventing parallel supply chains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] fine for confirming quality, but they do nothing to avoid parallel channels. As I keep writing, early inspections are strongly recommended. First, very serious issues (which can convince a buyer to cancel an order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fine for confirming quality, but they do nothing to avoid parallel channels. As I keep writing, early inspections are strongly recommended. First, very serious issues (which can convince a buyer to cancel an order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to deal with laboratory tests?</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>How to deal with laboratory tests?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] and at the same time perform a quality check on some samples. The advantage of doing this during production is that quality issues can be noticed and corrected early, without incurring significant shipment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and at the same time perform a quality check on some samples. The advantage of doing this during production is that quality issues can be noticed and corrected early, without incurring significant shipment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How suppliers can play to avoid QC inspections</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>How suppliers can play to avoid QC inspections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] All these games happen because importers tend to inspect too late&#8230; See Why inspecting quality earlier is better. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All these games happen because importers tend to inspect too late&#8230; See Why inspecting quality earlier is better. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forgot to have quality inspected before shipment? &#171; Quality Inspection Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/inspecting-quality-earlier-is-better-the-1-10-100-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Forgot to have quality inspected before shipment? &#171; Quality Inspection Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=35#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Inspection Blog China production: what to expect &amp; how to inspect      &#171; Inspecting quality earlier is better: the 1-10-100 rule The importer&#8217;s dilemma: legal risks or higher costs? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inspection Blog China production: what to expect &amp; how to inspect      &laquo; Inspecting quality earlier is better: the 1-10-100 rule The importer&#8217;s dilemma: legal risks or higher costs? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

