<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letting a supplier ship the products after a failed inspection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qualityinspection.org/letting-a-supplier-ship-the-products-after-a-failed-inspection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/letting-a-supplier-ship-the-products-after-a-failed-inspection/</link>
	<description>Advice and tips for successful quality control of consumer products made in China &#38; Asia: sourcing strategies, quality control...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edjusted</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/letting-a-supplier-ship-the-products-after-a-failed-inspection/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>edjusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=329#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Great, informative web site! We are slowly trying to get better QC procedures in place with our factories, but currently most of *our* QC is done *after* the product arrives in the U.S. Recently we&#039;ve had some difficulties with a manufacturer getting logo colors right. The factory ask us to send the product back. Normally this wouldn&#039;t be a problem, but this product has been selling well and we&#039;re very behind. Our sales manager wants to sell the product as it&#039;s borderline acceptable and doesn&#039;t want to wait for a redo. This is actually the 3rd recent shipment with the same kind of problem and outcome, and I&#039;m concerned that we&#039;re coming off as wishy-washy to the factory, since we keep telling them the product isn&#039;t acceptable, then later tell them it sort-of is. Any suggestions on how to deal with the factory on this kind of issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, informative web site! We are slowly trying to get better QC procedures in place with our factories, but currently most of *our* QC is done *after* the product arrives in the U.S. Recently we&#8217;ve had some difficulties with a manufacturer getting logo colors right. The factory ask us to send the product back. Normally this wouldn&#8217;t be a problem, but this product has been selling well and we&#8217;re very behind. Our sales manager wants to sell the product as it&#8217;s borderline acceptable and doesn&#8217;t want to wait for a redo. This is actually the 3rd recent shipment with the same kind of problem and outcome, and I&#8217;m concerned that we&#8217;re coming off as wishy-washy to the factory, since we keep telling them the product isn&#8217;t acceptable, then later tell them it sort-of is. Any suggestions on how to deal with the factory on this kind of issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

