<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock lots and brandname copies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qualityinspection.org/stock-lots-brand-copies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/stock-lots-brand-copies/</link>
	<description>Advice and tips for successful quality control of consumer products made in China: sourcing strategies, supplier communication, QC inspections...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preventing parallel supply chains</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/stock-lots-brand-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Preventing parallel supply chains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=702#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] In my last post I wrote about what I call &#8220;parallel supply chains&#8221; from China to Western countries: stock lots left in factories, and copies of brand name products. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my last post I wrote about what I call &#8220;parallel supply chains&#8221; from China to Western countries: stock lots left in factories, and copies of brand name products. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renaud Anjoran</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/stock-lots-brand-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Renaud Anjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=702#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Good question, thanks! I&#039;ll definitely give it a thought and I&#039;ll publish it if it&#039;s worth something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, thanks! I&#8217;ll definitely give it a thought and I&#8217;ll publish it if it&#8217;s worth something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Law</title>
		<link>http://www.qualityinspection.org/stock-lots-brand-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>China Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qualityinspection.org/?p=702#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I had a client who had QC problems with its product and asked its manufacturer to destroy all of it.  Within a few months, my client was getting complaints from consumers in the US who had bought the bad product on the grey market.  Technically/legally, my client did not need to honor the warranty for those products, but it chose to do so from strictly a business perspective.  The point here is that companies can lose more than money when these things happen; they can also have their reputations impaired.   Would love to see a follow-up post on how to stop this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a client who had QC problems with its product and asked its manufacturer to destroy all of it.  Within a few months, my client was getting complaints from consumers in the US who had bought the bad product on the grey market.  Technically/legally, my client did not need to honor the warranty for those products, but it chose to do so from strictly a business perspective.  The point here is that companies can lose more than money when these things happen; they can also have their reputations impaired.   Would love to see a follow-up post on how to stop this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
