The 3 types of sourcing companies in China

by Renaud Anjoran on 7 February 2012

When an importer wants to source a new product in China, he basically has 4 options, 3 of which involve the use of a sourcing company:

Sourcing agents in China

Of course, you can find a supplier on a trade show or in an online directory (e.g. Global Sources), ensure they are serious via a background check and a technical audit, and start purchasing directly.

If you have the right organization to support this model and if you find suppliers easily, you don’t need a sourcing agent.

In other cases, you need to make a choice between three types of sourcing agents:

The commissioned agent

If you find someone that you can trust, and who already has deep experience in the product line you are looking for, this can be a good option. You pay this agent a fixed proportion (usually between 5% and 10%) of the FOB price for the orders that he follows.

The problem is, importers are seldom good at judging whether someone is trustworthy. I bet 95% of commissioned agents get money from the factory without telling the buyer. When things go wrong, many of them actually defend the factories in front of their clients! This is why I generally don’t advise to use this type of agent.

I classified it as “high involvement” because the purchaser needs to follow what happens closely. These agents are seldom professional enough to really manage production and to ensure good outcomes. Once the orders reach a certain size, it is much better to manage everything with your own team.

Related articles:

The trading company

If you purchase low quantities and if you don’t want to handle all the details of China production, you probably need to work with a trading company. They can find small factories (often unable of dealing directly with export customers) that are interested in your small orders.

The trader adds its margin on top of the manufacturer’s price. That’s why many professional purchasers want to “go direct”. This is not rational because, if you negotiate prices, a trader might still be cheaper than a larger factory (which tends to be more expensive than small workshops, in China anyway).

What bothers some importers is that the supply chain remains hidden. This is a valid concern. Even if you purchase from a trader, you should inspect the product quality — except if the trader pays for a famous third-party QC firm to do it, and shows you the reports.

Related articles:

The third party service provider

As the saying goes, you can eliminate the middleman, but you’ll have to take over the functions he performs… Or subcontract them to a third party!

If you place large orders, many manufacturers will take the time to respond to a third-party service company’s inquiries. And the service fees will likely be low, compared to the total order size. This is why this option is best suited for large orders.

If you can justify the upfront investment, this is a great way to source new products. You’ll benefit from a professional identification & screening process, and you will have full information over your supply chain.

Some of these companies sell their services as “project management”, “procurement”, or “supply chain management”. They often adapt their pricing structure to each customer. Some of them act as a trader and take possession of the goods. Not all of them are 100% transparent about every sub-supplier.  I admit this is a wide category…

Related article:

Top 10 mistakes to avoid when outsourcing your sourcing

What do you think?

  • Jose Luis Val

    I agree with your post but I also think that not only large orders justify third party service provider or a direct purchase but also when the product is critical, I mean strategic material , custom design, etc

  • Renaud Anjoran

    Jose Luis Val,
    You are right. There are many exceptions to my classification. Every classification is a simplification, if we want it to remain readable.

  • Buck

    Great write up Renaud and generally good summary of the sourcing options available to importers. I think that there could maybe also be a 4th type of sourcing agent option added, which is essentially having a representative sourcing office (as opposed to contracting an agent). This is an option that combines many of the characteristics from the other options by offering full-service solutions which is generally more professional than the commissioned agent and more comprehensive than the 3rd party described. Some points are that pricing schemes are more flexible given the type of order (though often do work on either a retainer fee or commission) and it is generally more efficient if you have larger orders though still potentially feasible otherwise depending on the situation (as noted by Jose above). Wonder what your thoughts are on this option?

  • Renaud Anjoran

    As you write, it is an hybrid of the 3 options I described above: sometimes paid by commissions, sometimes for a fixed amount, sometimes (for some of them) buys and resales the goods.
    Generally it allows the importer to be less involved in following production, so it should be in the left quadrants — I would see it together with the “3rd party sourcing agent”.
    I am going to update the article and write something about this. Thanks for mentioning it.

  • Buck

    No problem. Definitely agree it is a wide category. It is a pretty busy category as well as there are a lot of companies that adapt and differentiate themselves while possibly still falling under that category.


    It is true. My experience is that Chinese supply as per country specific and own inspection and checking is very imporatant in any case because it is most possible that you will not get exact material. We find this is happening with Indain importers. This is appliable in Machinery and Industrial goods. Moreover they donot supply any spare parts list and prices ,therefore getting spares becomes difficult mostly.Safety is also aconcern with mosty of the prodcuts.

  • Tom

    If i’m an import agent could I go to a third party for large orders? sort of defeats the purpose of been an agent , but could it work?

  • Renaud Anjoran

    Not necessarily. If you purchase from a small factory (that can’t deal direct with export customers) through a trading company (that only takes a few %), it can make sense.

  • tom


  • luisa

    i think commissioned agent is better than trading company, because only commissioned agent is taking percentage from factory, and when you work with trading company, the company+sourcing guy in the company are taking percentage.

  • Renaud Anjoran

    Hahaha that’s a funny comment. Yes, sometimes the purchaser or a manager in the trading company also takes a commission in his pocket from the factory.

Previous post:

Next post: